Assessment of Forest Health in Various Forest Types in Lampung Province
In Lampung Province, awareness of the importance of forest health in achieving sustainable forest management in various types of forests is still low so that forest health problems have not received serious attention so far. This study aims to obtain indicators of forest health assessment and the status of forest health conditions in various types of forests in Lampung Province. This research was carried out in mangrove and community forests in East Lampung District, and protected and conservation forests in Tanggamus District in 2018. The stages of this study consisted of formulating guarantees of forest health indicators, making measuring plots, measuring forest health, processing data, and forest health assessment. The results showed that indicators for assessing the health of forests in mangrove forests are vitality and biodiversity, in community forests are productivity, vitality and site quality, in protected forests are biodiversity, vitality and productivity, and in conservation forests are biodiversity and productivity. The status of health conditions in each cluster of plots in mangrove forest is bad and good, in community forests is good and medium, in protected forests is bad and good, and in conservation forests are bad and good.
Keywords: indicator, forest health status, forest types, Lampung Province
Ginting AN. dan Nuhamara ST. 2001. Soil Indicator: Present Status of Site Quality. Di dalam: Forest Health Monitoring to Monitor the Sustainability of Indonesian Tropical Rain Forest. Volume I. Japan: ITTO dan Bogor: SEAMEO-BIOTROP. 124p.
Hardjowigeno S. 2003. Ilmu Tanah. Akademika Pressindo, Jakarta. 305p.
Kasno, Haneda NF., Syaufina L, dan Putra E.I. 2007. Pengembangan metode penilaian kesehatan hutan lindung dan hutan tanaman. 5 Juni 2018. http://www.respository.ipb.ac.id/614.
Mangold R. 1997. Forest Health Monitoring: Field Methods Guide. USDA Forest Service, USA. 197p.
Nuhamara ST. dan Kasno. 2001. Present Status of Crown Indicators. Di dalam: Forest Health Monitoring to Monitor The Sustainability of Indonesian Tropical Rain Forest. Volume I. Japan: ITTO dan Bogor: SEAMEO-BIOTROP. 124p.
Nuhamara ST. dan Kasno. 2001. Present Status of Forest Vitality. Di dalam: Forest Health Monitoring to Monitor The Sustainability of Indonesian Tropical Rain Forest. Volume II. Japan: ITTO dan Bogor : SEAMEO-BIOTROP. 176p.
Nuhamara ST., Kasno, dan Irawan US. 2001. Assessment on Damage Indicators in Forest Health Monitoring to Monitor the Sustainability of Indonesian Tropical Rain Forest. Di dalam: Forest Health Monitoring to Monitor The Sustainability of Indonesian Tropical Rain Forest. Volume II. Japan: ITTO dan Bogor : SEAMEO-BIOTROP. 176p.
Philip MS. 1994. Measuring Trees and Forest. CAB International, Wallingford. 324p.
Pranata RA. 2012. Ekologi Tumbuhan: Vitalitas. 15 Juli 2018. http://rianbio.wordpress.com/rianhilyawan12-2/page/4/.
Prianto E., Rhomie JH., Ramses F., Taufik H., dan Miswadi. 2006. Keanekaragaman Hayati dan Struktur Ekologi Mangrove Dewasa Di Kawasan Pesisir Kota Dumai-Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Biodiversitas 7(4):327-332.
Putra E.I. 2004. Pengembangan Metode Penilaian Kesehatan Hutan Alam Produksi. Tesis. Institut Pertanian Bogor, 106p.
Safeâ€™i R. 2005. Penilaian Areal Hutan Bekas Terbakar Berdasarkan Metode Fire Severity dan Forest Health Monitoring. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. 101p.
Safeâ€™i R., Hardjanto, Supriyanto, Leti Sundawati. 2014. Value of Vitality Status in Monoculture and Agroforestry Planting Systems of the Community Forest. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research 18(2):340-353.
Safeâ€™i R., Hardjanto, Supriyanto, dan Sundawati L. 2015. Pengembangan Metode Penilaian Kesehatan Hutan Rakyat Sengon. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman 12(3):175-187.
Safeâ€™i R. 2015. Kajian Kesehatan Hutan Dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Rakyat di Provinsi Lampung. Disertasi. Program Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor. 124p.
Saaty TL. 1996. The Analytic Hieararchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh. 287p.
Saaty TL. 2003. Decision-Making with the AHP: Why is The Proncipal Eigenvector Necessary. European Journal of Operational Research 145(2003):85-91.
Saaty TL. 2005. Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh. 324p.
Supriyanto, Stolte KW., Soekotjo, dan Gintings AN. 2001. Present Status of Crown Indicators. Di dalam: Forest Health Monitoring to Monitor The Sustainability of Indonesian Tropical Rain Forest. Volume I. Japan: ITTO dan Bogor: SEAMEOBIOTROP. 124p.
Soerianegara I. dan Indrawan A. 2005. Ekologi Hutan Indonesia. Fakultas Kehutanan IPB, Bogor. 83p.
United States Development Agency-Forest Service (USDA-FS). 1999. Forest Health Monitoring: Field Methods Guide (International 1999). USDA Forest Service Research Triangle Park, Asheville NC. 199p.
How to Cite
PDF downloaded: 0 times
Copyright (c) 2019 Rahmat Safe'i, Christine Wulandari, Hari Kaskoyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).