Assessment of the Physical Quality of Eucalyptus pellita Seedlings from Shoot Cutting by Age Level
Authors
-
Hanna Artuti Ekamawanti
Faculty of Forestry, Tanjungpura University
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8834-9482
- Lenawati Simanjuntak Faculty of Forestry, Tanjungpura University
- Abdurrani Muin Faculty of Forestry, Tanjungpura University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl29280-290Abstract
The criteria for target seedling of Eucalyptus pellita F. Muell are at least 90 days old, with consequences for the length of stay of the seedlings in the nursery. This study must assess the suitability as a target seedling first if it wants to plant the seedlings under 90days old in the field. The research aimed to evaluate and obtain the regression equation for the seedling's age with the seedling's morphological characters. The shoot seedlings cuttings aged 45, 60, 75, and 90 days after planting in the cocopeat growing medium were assessed. The study was used a survey method with a purposive sampling technique to obtain 60 samples by assessing the growth and appearances of the seedling. Furthermore, 15 samples were taken at random to determine the dry weight of the seedlings. Seedlings aged 75 and 90 days indicated the standard criteria as target seedlings for height, diameter, number of leaves, seedling's health, shoot appearances, and seedling roots. The two seedlings'age levels have a sturdiness index of 8.34-9.78; shoot-root ratio 3.9-4.5; and seedling quality index (SQI) 0.22-0.23. Seedling age had a powerful positive correlation with the sturdiness index and SQI (r = 0.84 and r = 0.96). The regression equation of the sturdiness index is y = 0.048x + 5.435 (R2 = 0.996) and SQI is y = 0.004x - 0.064 (R2 = 0.926). This research implies that 75 and 90-days seedlings can be considered as one of the criteria for the age of E. pellita shoot cuttings as the target seedling in the SOP of PT. Finnantara Intiga.
Keywords: cocopeat, Eucalyptus pellita, seedling quality index, shoot cuttings, target seedling
Downloads
References
Adman, B. 2011. Pertumbuhan Tiga Kelas Mutu Bibit Meranti Merah Pada Tiga IUPHHK di Kalimantan. Jurnal Penelitian Dipterokarpa 5(2): 47–60.
Booth, T.H. 2013. Eucalypt plantations and climate change. Forest Ecology and Management 301: 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.004
BSN. 1999. Standardisasi Nasional Indonesia 015005.1-1999: Standardisasi mutu bibit jenis meranti. Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN), Jakarta, Indonesia.
BSN. 2018. Standardisasi Nasional Indonesia 8420-2018: Bibit tanaman hutan. Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN), Jakarta, Indonesia.
Budiman, B., Sudrajat, D.J., Lee, D.K., dan Kim, Y.S. 2015. Effect of initial morphology on field performance in white jabon seedlings at Bogor, Indonesia. Forest Science and Technology 11(4): 206 - 205. DOI:10.1080/21580103.2015. 1007897.
Dayamanti, R.U., Sudrajat, D.J. 2019. Korelasi karakteristik bibit nyamplung (Calophyllum inophyllum L.) dengan pertumbuhan tanaman pada tingkat lapang. Jurnal Wasian 6(1): 45–55.
Dickson, A., Leaf, A.L., dan Hosner, J.F. 1960. Quality appraisal of white spruce and white pine seedling stock in nurseries. Forest Chronical 36: 10-13.
Haase, D.L. 2008. Understanding Forest Seedling Quality: Measurements and Interpretation. Tree Planters’ Notes 52(2): 24 - 30.
Harwood, C.E., Alloysius, D., Pomroy, P., Robson, K.W., dan Haines, M.W. 1997. Early growth and survival of Eucalyptus pellita provenances in a range of tropical environments, compared with E. grandis, E. urophylla, and Acacia mangium. New Forests 14: 203-219. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006524405455
Hasnah, T.M. 2014. Keragaman genetik meranti (Shorea leprosula Miq.) asal Kalimantan dengan analisis isozim. Jurnal Penelitian Dipterokarpa 8(1): 35-46.
Hendromono. 2003. Kriteria Penilaian Mutu Bibit dalam Wadah yang Siap Tanam untuk Rehabilitasi Hutan dan Lahan. Buletin Peneltian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan 4(1): 11-20. Badan Litbang Kehutanan, Jakarta.
Herawan, T., dan Leksono, B. 2018. Regenerasi in vitro Eucalyptus pellita F. Muell menggunakan kultur mata tunas. Jurnal Perbenihan Tanaman Hutan 6(1): 1-13.
Hii, S.Y., Ha, K.S., Ngui, M.L., Ak Penguang, S., Duju, A., Teng, X.Y., dan Meder, R. 2017. Assessment of plantation-grown in Borneo, Malaysia for solid wood utilization. Australian Forestry 80(1): 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2016.1272526
Hijriani, A., Muludi, K., dan Andini, E.A. 2016. Implementasi Metode Regresi Linier Sederhana Pada Penyajian Hasil Prediksi Pemakaian Air Bersih PDAM Way Rilau Kota Bandar Lampung Dengan Sistem Informasi Geofrafis. Jurnal Informatika Mulawarman 11(2): 37- 46.
Karyaatmaja, B., Ali, C., dan Tampubolon, A.P. 2001. Standardisasi mutu bibit tusam (Pinus merkusii). Prosiding Pertemuan dan Presentasi Ilmiah Standardisasi dan Jaminan Mutu. Badan Standardisasi Nasional, Jakarta.
Katemba, P., Djoh, R.K. 2017. Prediksi Tingkat Produksi Kopi Menggunakan Regresi Linear. Jurnal Ilmiah Flash 3(1): 42-5.
Leach, G.N., Gresham, H.H., dan Webb, A. L. 1986. Seedling grade and nursery seedling density effects on field growth in loblolly pine. Champion International Corp. Gulf States Operation Res. Note GS-86-03. 12 p.
Leksono, B. 2010. Efisiensi Seleksi Awal Pada Kebun Benih Semai Eucalyptus pellita. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman 7(1): 1–13.
Lumbres, R.I.C., Lee,Y.J., Yun, C.W., Koo, C.D., Kim, S.B., Son, Y.M., … Seo, Y.O. 2015. DBH-height modeling and validation for Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus pellita in Korintiga Hutani plantation, Kalimantan, Indonesia. Forest Science and Technology 11(3): 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2014.957356
Mindawati, N. 2011. Kajian Kualitas Tapak Hutan Tanaman Industri Hibrid sebagai Bahan Baku Industri Pulp dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Lestari. Disertasi. Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
Mindawati, N., dan Susilo, E.Y. 2005. Pengaruh Macam Media Terhadap Pertumbuhan Semai Acacia mangium Willd. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan dan Konservasi Alam 2(1): 53-59.
Mullin, R. E., dan Christi, C. 1982. Morphological grading of white pine nursery stock. Forestry Chronicle 58(l): 40 - 43.
Nababan, D. 2009. Pertumbuhan Stek Ekaliptus Klon IND 48. Skripsi. Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Nambiar, E.K.S. dan Harwood, C.E. 2014. Productivity of acacia and eucalypt plantations in South-East Asia 1. Biophysical determinants of production: opportunities and challenges. International Forestry Review 16(2): 225–248.
Nurhasybi, Sudrajat, D.J., dan Suita, E. 2019. Kriteria Bibit Tanaman Hutan Siap Tanam : Untuk Pembangunan Hutan dan Rehabilitasi Lahan. IPB Press, Bogor.
Omon, M. 2008. Teknik Kriteria dan Indikator Mutu Bibit Dipterocapaceae. Proseding Workshop Sintesa Hasil Litbang Hutan Tanaman, Bogor 19 Desember 2008. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hutan Tanaman. Bogor.
Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Rehabilitasi Lahan dan Perhutanan Sosial (RPLS) Nomor 05/V-SET/2009 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Penilaian Mutu Bibit Tanaman Hutan. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Jakarta.
Roller, K.J. 1977. Suggested minimum standards for containerized seedlings in Nova Scotia. Can. For. Serv. Dept. Environ. Inf. Rep. M-X-69.
Rowan, S.J. 1986. Seedbed density affects performance of slash and loblolly pine in Georgia. p. 126-135. In Proc International Symposium on Nursery Management Practices for the Southern Pines (D.B. South, ed.). Ala. Agric. Exp. Sta., Auburn University, AL.
Sharma, R. K., Mason, E. G., dan Sorensson, C. 2007. Impact of planting stock quality on initial growth and survival of radiata pine clones and modelling initial growth and survival. NZ Journal of Forestry May 2007: 14-23.
Simetti, R., Bonduelle, G.M., Silva, D.A. da, Mayer, S.L.S., Souza, H.P., dan Muniz, G.I.B. de. 2018. Production of biomass and energy stock for five Eucalyptus species. Revista Ciência Da Madeira-RCM 9(1): 30-36. https://doi.org/10.12953/2177-6830/rcmv9n1p30-36
Thompson, B.E. 1985. Seedling morphological evaluation: what you can tell by looking. In Duryea, M.L. Proceedings evaluation seedling quality; principles, procedurs and predictive abilities of mayor test. Oregon State University. Forest Research Laboratory. pp. 59-71.
Thompson, J. R. dan Schultz, R.C. 1995. Root system morphology of Quercus rubra L. planting stock and 3-year field performance in Iowa. New Forest 9: 225 -236.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Statistics
Abstract views: 304 times
PDF downloaded: 218 times
Metrics
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Hanna Artuti Ekamawanti, Lenawati Simanjuntak, Lenawati Simanjuntak, Abdurrani Muin, Abdurrani Muin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
