Qualitative Anatomical Characteristics of Compression, Lateral, and Opposite Woods in Pinus merkusii and Agathis loranthifolia

Authors

  • Byantara Darsan Purusatama Institute of Forest Science, Kangwon National University
  • Jong Ho Kim Department of Forest Biomaterials Engineering, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University
  • Go Un Yang Department of Forest Biomaterials Engineering, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University
  • Fauzi Febrianto Department of Forest Products, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University
  • Wahyu Hidayat Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung
  • Seung Hwan Lee Department of Forest Biomaterials Engineering, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University
  • Nam Hun Kim Department of Forest Biomaterials Engineering, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl29213-222

Abstract

This study aimed to observe andcompare the qualitative anatomical characteristics of compression (CW), lateral (LW), and opposite (OW) woodsin the stem wood of Sumatran pine (Pinus merkusii) and Agathis (Agathis loranthifolia). The anatomical characteristics were observed using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. CW showed a gradual transition from earlywood to latewood in both species, circular tracheid shape, many intercellular spaces, irregular tracheid tips, helical cavities, and slit-like bordered pits. CW of Sumatran pine showed an indistinct growth ring, whileCW of Agathis showed a distinct growth ring. Helical ribs occurred only in CW of Sumatran pine. LW and OW showed an oval tracheid with an angular outline, regular tracheid arrangement, and tapered tracheid tips in both species. LW and OW showed mainly uniseriate bordered pits in Sumatran pine, while LW and OW of Agathis frequently showed multiseriatebordered pits. CW, LW, and OW showed fusiform and uniseriate rays in Sumatran pine, while those of Agathis showed uniseriate rays. In conclusion, CW showed distinctive qualitative anatomical characteristics to LW and OW in both species, while LW and OW mainly showed similar characteristics. In particular, there were considerably distinctive characteristics between CW from both species.

Keywords: Agathis, anatomical characteristics, reaction wood, Sumatran pine

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

28-05-2021

How to Cite

Purusatama, B. D., Kim, J. H., Yang, G. U., Febrianto, F., Hidayat, W., Lee, S. H., & Kim, N. H. (2021). Qualitative Anatomical Characteristics of Compression, Lateral, and Opposite Woods in Pinus merkusii and Agathis loranthifolia. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 9(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl29213-222

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): May

Section

Articles

Statistics

 Abstract views: 148 times
 PDF downloaded: 227 times

Metrics

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Byantara Darsan Purusatama, Jong Ho Kim, Go Un Yang, Fauzi Febrianto, Wahyu Hidayat, Seung Hwan Lee, Nam Hun Kim

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).