Characteristics of Polyurethane Cross-Laminated Timber Made from a Combination of Pine and Coconut

Authors

  • Muhammad Iqbal Adi Baskara Department of Forest Products, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University
  • Yusuf Sudo Hadi Department of Forest Products, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University
  • Muhammad Adly Rahandi Lubis Research Center for Biomass and Bioproducts, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)
  • Muhammad Iqbal Maulana Research Center for Biomass and Bioproducts, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)
  • Rita Kartika Sari Department of Forest Products, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University
  • Fauzi Febrianto Department of Forest Products, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University
  • Wahyu Hidayat Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v11i2.691

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the properties of cross-laminated timber (CLT) fabricated from the combination of Sumatran pine (P) and coconut trunk (C) bonded with polyurethane adhesive. The basic properties of raw materials and adhesives were characterized. The CLT panels’ length, width, and thickness are 100 cm by 30 cm by 3.6 cm, respectively. Three-layer CLT was made with 4 combinations of face/core/back lamina, i.e., PPP, CCC, PCP, and CPC, which are arranged perpendicular to each other. The laminae were bonded using PU adhesive on 160 g.m-2 glue spread. The CLT’s delamination and wood failure percentages (WFP) were assessed following the JAS 3079 (2019) standard. The study’s results demonstrated that the PU adhesive employed in this investigation could curl ideally at 30°C for 200 min. Solid pine and coconut’s physical and chemical characteristics differed, but their wettability to polyurethane adhesives was identical. Hybrid pine CLT has greater attributes compared to single pine CLT. Single coconut CLT, on the other hand, offers better features than hybrid coconut CLT. All CLT samples failed to fulfil the JAS 3079 (2019) requirement for delamination (=< 10%) and WFP (>= 90%).

Keywords: Coconut trunk, cross-laminated timber, layer combination, pine wood, polyurethane adhesive

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Muhammad Adly Rahandi Lubis, Research Center for Biomass and Bioproducts, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)

 

 

 

 

Downloads

Published

28-05-2023

How to Cite

Baskara, M. I. A. ., Hadi, Y. S. ., Lubis, M. A. R., Maulana, M. I. ., Sari, R. K. ., Febrianto, F. ., & Hidayat, W. (2023). Characteristics of Polyurethane Cross-Laminated Timber Made from a Combination of Pine and Coconut. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 11(2), 270–293. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v11i2.691

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): May

Section

Articles

Statistics

 Abstract views: 478 times
 PDF downloaded: 371 times

Metrics

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Iqbal Adi Baskara, Yusuf Sudo Hadi, Muhammad Adly Rahandi Lubis, Muhammad Iqbal Maulana, Rita Kartika Sari, Fauzi Febrianto, Wahyu Hidayat

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).